|
RCF Requirements 15 Dec 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collider Parameters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Run length (weeks) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Run length (seconds) |
weeks*7*24*60*60 = S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15120000 |
|
|
|
|
|
RHIC Duty factor |
RD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type |
Cost/node |
|
CPU ($/SI95) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$22.0 |
$22 |
|
|
Type 2: 2-U SCSI |
$3,740 |
|
Disk - Central ($/TB) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$19,500 |
$15,000 |
$13,700 |
$10,900 |
$13,700 |
|
|
Type 3: 1-U IDE |
$3,260 |
|
Disk - Distributed ($/TB) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$7,000 |
|
|
Type 4: 1-U SCSI |
$3,920 |
|
Cost per disk ($) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$260 |
$750 |
$511 |
|
|
|
|
|
Disk size (TB) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.12 |
0.14 |
0.073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRAHMS |
PHENIX |
PHOBOS |
STAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconstrained |
Constrained |
Unconstrained |
Constrained |
Unconstrained |
Constrained1 |
Constrained2 |
DAQ 100 |
Constrained 1 |
Constrained 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for FY02 |
|
$77,273 |
$77,273 |
$309,091 |
$309,091 |
$154,545 |
$154,545 |
$154,545 |
$309,091 |
$309,091 |
$309,091 |
$850,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Spent in FY02 |
|
$4,990 |
$4,990 |
$34,340 |
$34,340 |
$27,491 |
$27,491 |
$27,491 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for CPU and Disk in FY02 |
|
$72,283 |
$72,283 |
$274,751 |
$274,751 |
$127,054 |
$127,054 |
$127,054 |
$309,091 |
$309,091 |
$309,091 |
$783,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimate for CPU and Disk in FY03 |
|
$118,182 |
$118,182 |
$472,727 |
$472,727 |
$236,364 |
$236,364 |
$236,364 |
$472,727 |
$472,727 |
$472,727 |
$1,300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Input Data from Experiments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRAHMS |
PHENIX |
PHOBOS |
STAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 27, 02 |
|
May 21, 02 |
Jun 24, 02 |
Apr 1, 02 |
Apr 9, 02 |
|
|
May 23, 02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experiment Parameters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRAHMS |
PHENIX |
PHOBOS |
STAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconstrained |
Constrained |
Unconstrained |
Constrained |
Unconstrained |
Constrained1 |
Constrained2 |
DAQ 100 |
Constrained 1 |
Constrained 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Event size (Mbytes) |
ES |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.05 |
0.1 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Event rate (Hz) |
ER |
100 |
100 |
300 |
200 |
500 |
500 |
500 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experiment Duty factor |
ED |
0.95 |
0.95 |
0.95 |
0.95 |
0.95 |
0.95 |
0.95 |
0.95 |
0.95 |
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw Data rate to HPSS (Mbytes/sec) |
ES*ER*RD*ED = DR |
3.1 |
3.1 |
51.3 |
34.2 |
28.5 |
14.3 |
28.5 |
57.0 |
57.0 |
57.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw Data Volume (TB) |
DR*S/1000000 = DV |
47.4 |
47.4 |
775.7 |
517.1 |
430.9 |
215.5 |
430.9 |
861.8 |
861.8 |
861.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of events (M) |
(DV/ES) = NE |
862 |
862 |
2,586 |
1,724 |
4,309 |
4,309 |
4,309 |
172 |
172 |
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconstruction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRAHMS |
PHENIX |
PHOBOS |
STAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconstrained |
Constrained |
Unconstrained |
Constrained |
Unconstrained |
Constrained1 |
Constrained2 |
DAQ 100 |
Constrained 1 |
Constrained 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconstruction time min (sec/event) |
Tmin |
0.08 |
0.08 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
6 |
30 |
90 |
90 |
|
|
|
Pentium Pro |
200 |
8.09 |
Reconstruction time max (sec/event) |
Tmax |
0.13 |
0.13 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
2 |
6 |
130 |
90 |
90 |
|
|
|
Pentium II |
300 |
12.90 |
Improvement factor |
fact |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
|
|
|
Pentium II |
400 |
16.90 |
<SI95>/CPU |
SI |
48.6 |
48.6 |
20 |
20 |
48.63 |
48.63 |
48.63 |
48.63 |
48.63 |
48.63 |
|
|
|
Pentium II |
333 |
14.00 |
Min SI95-sec/event |
Tmin*SI/fact = MinSI |
3.65 |
3.65 |
100 |
100 |
291.78 |
97.26 |
291.78 |
1042.07 |
3126.21 |
3126.21 |
|
|
|
Pentium III |
450 |
18.50 |
Max SI95-sec/event |
Tmax*Si/fact = MaxSI |
6.08 |
6.08 |
120 |
120 |
291.78 |
97.26 |
291.78 |
4515.64 |
3126.21 |
3126.21 |
|
|
|
Pentium III |
550 |
22.60 |
Min Total kSI95-sec/pass |
MinSi*NE*1000= TMinSI |
3,141,407 |
3,141,407 |
258,552,000 |
172,368,000 |
1,257,338,376 |
419,112,792 |
1,257,338,376 |
179,619,768 |
538,859,304 |
538,859,304 |
|
|
|
Pentium III |
800 |
38.40 |
Max Total kSI95-sec/pass |
MaxSI*NE*1000 = TMaxSI |
5,235,678 |
5,235,678 |
310,262,400 |
206,841,600 |
1,257,338,376 |
419,112,792 |
1,257,338,376 |
778,352,328 |
538,859,304 |
538,859,304 |
|
|
|
Pentium III |
1000 |
48.63 |
Reconstruction pass length (weeks) |
|
8 |
8 |
24 |
24 |
25 |
52 |
208 |
25 |
104 |
37 |
|
|
|
Pentium III |
1500 |
72.95 |
Reconstruction pass length (seconds) |
weeks*7*24*60*60 = SR |
4838400 |
4838400 |
14515200 |
14515200 |
15120000 |
31449600 |
125798400 |
15120000 |
62899200 |
22377600 |
|
|
|
Pentium 4 |
2000 |
72.3 |
Reconstruction Farm efficiency |
FE |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.95 |
0.8 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.8 |
|
|
|
Pentium 4 |
2400 |
87 |
Min Size of Farm (SI95/pass) |
TMinSI/SR/FE = Smin |
1,082 |
1,082 |
23,750 |
15,833 |
110,876 |
14,028 |
12,494 |
15,839 |
11,423 |
30,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Max Size of Farm (SI95/pass) |
TMaxSI/SR/FE = Smax |
1,804 |
1,804 |
28,500 |
19,000 |
110,876 |
14,028 |
12,494 |
68,638 |
11,423 |
30,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Size of Farm (SI95) |
Curr |
2,476 |
2,476 |
8,184 |
8,184 |
10,799 |
10,799 |
10,799 |
11,340 |
11,340 |
11,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit for Min (SI95) |
Curr-Smin = RSImin |
1,394 |
1,394 |
15,566 |
7,649 |
100,077 |
3,229 |
1,695 |
4,499 |
83 |
18,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of machines - Min |
RSImin/(SI/CPU)/2 |
9.55 |
9.55 |
106.70 |
52.43 |
685.98 |
22.13 |
11.62 |
30.84 |
0.57 |
128.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit for Max (SI95) |
Curr-Smax = RSImax |
672 |
672 |
20,316 |
10,816 |
100,077 |
3,229 |
1,695 |
57,298 |
83 |
18,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Machines - Max |
RSImax/(SI/CPU)/2 |
4.61 |
4.61 |
139.26 |
74.14 |
685.98 |
22.13 |
11.62 |
392.75 |
0.57 |
128.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of reconstruction passes |
NP |
2 |
2 |
1.5 |
1.2 |
2 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
2.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total time for reconstruction (seconds) |
SR*NP |
9676800 |
9676800 |
21772800 |
17418240 |
30240000 |
47174400 |
188697600 |
37800000 |
94348800 |
33566400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw Data Rate to Reco. Farm (MB/sec) |
DV/SR/FE = RDR |
16.3 |
16.3 |
71.3 |
47.5 |
38.0 |
7.2 |
4.3 |
76.0 |
18.3 |
48.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DST Size Relative to Raw |
DS |
0.34 |
0.34 |
1 |
1 |
1.8 |
3.6 |
1.8 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DST Rate to HPSS (Mbytes/sec) |
RDR*DS = DDR |
5.6 |
5.6 |
71.3 |
47.5 |
68.4 |
26.0 |
7.7 |
53.2 |
9.1 |
24.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DST Data Volume per pass (TB) |
DDR*SR*FE/1000000 |
16.1 |
16.1 |
775.7 |
517.1 |
775.7 |
775.7 |
775.7 |
603.3 |
430.9 |
430.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total DST Data Volume (TB) |
DSTVolume*NP |
32.2 |
32.2 |
1163.5 |
620.5 |
1551.3 |
1163.5 |
1163.5 |
1508.2 |
646.4 |
646.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRAHMS |
PHENIX |
PHOBOS |
STAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconstrained |
Constrained |
Unconstrained |
Constrained |
Unconstrained |
Constrained1 |
Constrained2 |
DAQ 100 |
Constrained 1 |
Constrained 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Size of CAS relative to CRS |
Current |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.93 |
0.93 |
0.07 |
0.07 |
0.07 |
0.36 |
0.36 |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Size of CAS relative to CRS |
(Desired ratio) R |
1.5 |
1.5 |
0.93 |
0.93 |
1.25 |
0.8 |
1 |
0.36 |
0.36 |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Min Size of Farm (SI95) |
R*Smin |
1,623 |
1,623 |
22,088 |
14,725 |
138,596 |
11,222 |
12,494 |
5,702 |
4,112 |
10,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Max Size of Farm (SI95) |
R*Smax |
2,705 |
2,705 |
26,505 |
17,670 |
138,596 |
11,222 |
12,494 |
24,710 |
4,112 |
10,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Size of CAS (SI95) |
CAS |
1,738 |
1,738 |
7,620 |
7,620 |
780 |
780 |
780 |
4,070 |
4,070 |
4,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit for Min (SI95) |
CAS-R*Smin = ASImin |
115 |
115 |
14,468 |
7,105 |
137,816 |
10,442 |
11,714 |
1,632 |
42 |
6,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Machines - Min |
ASImin/(SI/CPU)/2 |
0.79 |
0.79 |
99.17 |
48.70 |
944.65 |
71.58 |
80.29 |
11.19 |
0.29 |
46.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit for Max (SI95) |
CAS-R*Smax = ASImax |
967 |
967 |
18,885 |
10,050 |
137,816 |
10,442 |
11,714 |
20,640 |
42 |
6,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Machines - Max |
ASImax/(SI/CPU)/2 |
6.63 |
6.63 |
129.45 |
68.89 |
944.65 |
71.58 |
80.29 |
141.47 |
0.29 |
46.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numer of passes through the DST |
NPD |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
microDST Size Relative to DST |
mDS |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
0.17 |
0.06 |
0.17 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
microDST Volume (TB) |
Total DST * mDS |
4.83 |
4.83 |
193.91 |
129.28 |
131.86 |
43.09 |
131.86 |
120.66 |
86.18 |
86.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
nanoDST Size Relative to DST |
nDS |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.07 |
0.20 |
0.07 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
nanoDST Volume (TB) |
Total microDST * nDS |
0.5 |
0.5 |
19.4 |
12.9 |
9.2 |
8.6 |
9.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of DST Volume to get from HPSS |
|
50.0% |
50.0% |
12.5% |
17.5% |
10.0% |
5.0% |
5.0% |
50.0% |
50.0% |
50.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time to go through above fraction (sec) |
|
604800 |
604800 |
604800 |
1209600 |
604800 |
604800 |
604800 |
5184000 |
3456000 |
3456000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DST rate to CAS from HPSS (MB/sec) |
%DST/time |
13.3 |
13.3 |
160.3 |
74.8 |
128.3 |
64.1 |
64.1 |
58.2 |
62.3 |
62.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of micro DST Volume to get from disk |
|
50.0% |
50.0% |
50.0% |
30.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
50.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time to go through above fraction (sec) |
|
604800 |
604800 |
604800 |
604800 |
57600 |
57600 |
57600 |
10368000 |
10368000 |
3456000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate to CAS from disk (MB/sec) |
%microDST/time |
4.0 |
4.0 |
160.3 |
64.1 |
2289.3 |
748.1 |
2289.3 |
11.6 |
8.3 |
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRAHMS |
PHENIX |
PHOBOS |
STAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconstrained |
Constrained |
Unconstrained |
Constrained |
Unconstrained |
Constrained1 |
Constrained2 |
DAQ 100 |
Constrained 1 |
Constrained 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Raw on Central Disk |
|
3.50% |
3.50% |
0.05% |
0.05% |
0.10% |
0.10% |
0.10% |
3.00% |
3.00% |
1.50% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% DST on Central Disk |
|
15.0% |
15.0% |
1.0% |
0.1% |
0.15% |
0.15% |
0.15% |
25.0% |
5.0% |
2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% microDST on Central Disk |
|
100.0% |
100.0% |
50.0% |
30.0% |
1.0% |
5.0% |
1.0% |
100.0% |
50.0% |
20.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% nanoDST on Central Disk |
|
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
5.0% |
10.0% |
10.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Raw on Distributed Disk |
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
1.0% |
0.5% |
0.5% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% DST on Distributed Disk |
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
1.5% |
2.0% |
0.5% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% microDST on Distributed Disk |
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
100.0% |
20.0% |
15.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
30.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% nanoDST on Distributed Disk |
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central disk required (TB) |
Sum of %s of data |
9.4 |
9.4 |
124.5 |
52.5 |
3.4 |
4.4 |
3.8 |
297.3 |
90.5 |
38.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central disk available (TB) |
|
5.5 |
5.5 |
22.8 |
22.8 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
24.0 |
24.0 |
24.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central disk deficit (TB) |
Available - required |
3.9 |
3.9 |
101.7 |
29.7 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
0.6 |
273.3 |
66.5 |
14.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed disk required (TB) |
Sum of %s of data |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
157.0 |
33.8 |
35.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
25.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed disk available (TB) |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
18.9 |
18.9 |
18.9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed disk deficit (TB) |
Available - required |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
138.1 |
14.9 |
16.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
25.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRAHMS |
PHENIX |
PHOBOS |
STAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconstrained |
Constrained |
Unconstrained |
Constrained |
Unconstrained |
Constrained1 |
Constrained2 |
DAQ 100 |
Constrained 1 |
Constrained 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deficit Min (SI95) |
RSImin + ASImin |
1,509 |
1,509 |
30,034 |
14,754 |
237,893 |
13,671 |
13,408 |
6,132 |
125 |
25,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Machines - Min |
|
10.34 |
10.34 |
205.86 |
101.13 |
1,630.63 |
93.71 |
91.91 |
42.03 |
0.86 |
174.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost Min |
|
$0 |
$0 |
$660,737 |
$324,595 |
$5,233,644 |
$300,766 |
$294,980 |
$134,897 |
$2,747 |
$561,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deficit Max (SI95) |
RSImax + ASImax |
295 |
295 |
39,201 |
20,866 |
237,893 |
13,671 |
13,408 |
77,937 |
125 |
25,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Machines - Max |
|
2.02 |
2.02 |
268.70 |
143.03 |
1,630.63 |
93.71 |
91.91 |
534.22 |
0.86 |
174.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost Max |
|
$6,485 |
$6,485 |
$862,422 |
$459,052 |
$5,233,644 |
$300,766 |
$294,980 |
$1,714,622 |
$2,747 |
$561,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Disk deficit (TB) |
|
3.9 |
3.9 |
101.7 |
29.7 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
0.6 |
273.3 |
66.5 |
14.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost 0f Central Disk |
|
$53,360 |
$53,360 |
$1,393,191 |
$406,699 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$3,744,687 |
$910,957 |
$202,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed Disk deficit (TB) |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
138.1 |
14.9 |
16.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
25.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Distributed Disk |
|
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$966,951 |
$104,491 |
$112,997 |
$0 |
$0 |
$180,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost (Min) |
|
$53,360 |
$53,360 |
$2,053,928 |
$731,294 |
$6,200,595 |
$405,257 |
$407,977 |
$3,879,584 |
$913,704 |
$945,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost (Max) |
|
$59,846 |
$59,846 |
$2,255,613 |
$865,751 |
$6,200,595 |
$405,257 |
$407,977 |
$5,459,309 |
$913,704 |
$945,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Available funds |
|
$190,465 |
$190,465 |
$747,478 |
$747,478 |
$363,418 |
$363,418 |
$363,418 |
$781,818 |
$781,818 |
$781,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost Breakdown by Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRAHMS |
PHENIX |
PHOBOS |
STAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconstrained |
Constrained |
Unconstrained |
Constrained |
Unconstrained |
Constrained1 |
Constrained2 |
DAQ 100 |
Constrained 1 |
Constrained 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Machines in CRS with Disk in FY'02 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
200 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Machines in CRS without Disk in FY'02 |
|
1 |
1 |
40 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Machines in CAS with Disk in FY'02 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
300 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Machines in CAS without Disk in FY'02 |
|
2 |
2 |
40 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
80 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buy Central Disk in FY'02 |
1=yes, 0=no |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SI95 in CRS in FY'02 |
N*2*(SI/CPU) |
146 |
0 |
5836 |
0 |
29178 |
3939 |
3939 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SI95 in CAS in FY'02 |
|
292 |
0 |
5836 |
0 |
43767 |
584 |
584 |
11671 |
0 |
10796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total SI95 in FY'02 |
|
438 |
0 |
11671 |
0 |
72945 |
4523 |
4523 |
11671 |
0 |
10796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed Disk on CRS in FY'02 (TB) |
N*2*(disk size) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
29.20 |
3.94 |
3.94 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed Disk on CAS in FY'02 (TB) |
|
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
43.80 |
0.58 |
0.58 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
10.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Distributed Disk in FY'02 (TB) |
|
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
73.00 |
4.53 |
4.53 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
10.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of CPU and Distributed Disk FY'02 |
|
$9,629 |
$0 |
$256,766 |
$0 |
$2,115,790 |
$131,179 |
$131,179 |
$256,766 |
$0 |
$313,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Disk in FY'02 (TB) |
|
5.75 |
6.63 |
45.00 |
25.21 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.80 |
28.36 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Central Disk in FY'02 |
|
$62,654 |
$72,283 |
$675,000 |
$274,751 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$52,325 |
$309,091 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total money spent FY'02 |
|
$72,283 |
$72,283 |
$931,766 |
$274,751 |
$2,115,790 |
$131,179 |
$131,179 |
$309,091 |
$309,091 |
$313,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds Available FY'02 |
|
$72,283 |
$72,283 |
$274,751 |
$274,751 |
$127,054 |
$127,054 |
$127,054 |
$309,091 |
$309,091 |
$309,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
# CRS Machines w/ disk purchased '02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# CRS Machines w/o disk purchased '02 |
|
|
1 |
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# CAS Machines w/ disk purchased '02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
# CAS Machines w/o disk purchased '02 |
|
|
2 |
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Disk purchased FY'02 (TB) |
|
|
6.0 |
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2-U SCSI Machines in CRS in FY'03 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
63 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1-U IDE Machines in CRS in FY'03 |
|
3 |
0 |
50 |
0 |
500 |
72 |
0 |
200 |
0 |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1-U SCSI Machines in CRS in FY'03 |
|
0 |
3 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 2-U SCSI Machines in CAS in FY'03 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1-U IDE Machines in CAS in FY'03 |
|
3 |
0 |
50 |
0 |
600 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 1-U SCSI Machines in CAS in FY'03 |
|
0 |
3 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buy Central Disk in FY'03 |
1=yes, 0=no |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rack space used (u) |
|
6 |
6 |
100 |
50 |
1100 |
72 |
126 |
200 |
100 |
98 |
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
SI95 in CRS in FY'03 |
|
522 |
522 |
8700 |
4350 |
87000 |
12528 |
10962 |
34800 |
17400 |
8352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SI95 in CAS in FY'03 |
|
522 |
522 |
8700 |
4350 |
104400 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total SI95 in FY'03 |
|
1044 |
1044 |
17400 |
8700 |
191400 |
12528 |
10962 |
34800 |
17400 |
17052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed Disk on CRS in FY'03 (TB) |
|
0.69 |
0.41 |
11.50 |
3.40 |
115.00 |
16.56 |
17.77 |
46.00 |
13.60 |
11.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed Disk on CAS in FY'03 (TB) |
|
0.69 |
0.41 |
11.50 |
3.40 |
138.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
11.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Distributed Disk in FY'03 (TB) |
|
1.38 |
0.82 |
23.00 |
6.80 |
253.00 |
16.56 |
17.77 |
46.00 |
13.60 |
22.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of CPU and Distributed Disk FY'03 |
|
$19,560 |
$23,520 |
$326,000 |
$196,000 |
$3,586,000 |
$234,720 |
$235,620 |
$652,000 |
$392,000 |
$319,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Disk in FY'03 (TB) |
|
6.6 |
6.3 |
9.8 |
18.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
10.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Central Disk in FY'03 |
|
$98,622 |
$94,662 |
$146,727 |
$276,727 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$80,727 |
$153,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total money spent FY'03 |
|
$118,182 |
$118,182 |
$472,727 |
$472,727 |
$3,586,000 |
$234,720 |
$235,620 |
$652,000 |
$472,727 |
$472,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds Available FY'03 |
|
$118,182 |
$118,182 |
$472,727 |
$472,727 |
$236,364 |
$236,364 |
$236,364 |
$472,727 |
$472,727 |
$472,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CPU Purchased (SI95) |
|
1482 |
1044 |
29071 |
8700 |
264345 |
17051 |
15485 |
46471 |
17400 |
27848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPU Shortfall Min (SI95) |
Purchased - needed |
2990 |
2553 |
962 |
6054 |
26452 |
3379 |
2076 |
40339 |
17275 |
2321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPU Shortfall Max (SI95) |
|
1187 |
749 |
10130 |
12166 |
26452 |
3379 |
2076 |
31466 |
17275 |
2321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Central Disk Purchased (TB) |
|
12.32 |
12.94 |
54.78 |
43.65 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.80 |
33.74 |
10.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Disk Shortfall (TB) |
Purchased - needed |
8.43 |
9.05 |
46.91 |
13.97 |
1.03 |
0.00 |
0.56 |
268.53 |
32.75 |
4.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Distributed Disk Purchased (TB) |
|
1.38 |
0.82 |
23.00 |
6.80 |
326.00 |
21.09 |
22.29 |
46.00 |
13.60 |
33.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed Disk Shortfall (TB) |
Purchased - needed |
1.38 |
0.82 |
23.00 |
6.80 |
187.86 |
6.16 |
6.15 |
46.00 |
13.60 |
7.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final Size of CRS (SI95) |
|
3143.89 |
2998.00 |
22719.60 |
12534.00 |
126977.00 |
27266.03 |
25700.03 |
46140.00 |
28740.00 |
19692.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final Size of CAS (SI95) |
|
2551.78 |
2260.00 |
22155.60 |
11970.00 |
148947.00 |
1363.56 |
1363.56 |
15741.20 |
4070.00 |
23565.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final Size of Central Disk (TB) |
|
17.82 |
18.44 |
77.58 |
66.45 |
4.40 |
4.40 |
4.40 |
28.80 |
57.74 |
34.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final Size of Distributed Disk (TB) |
|
1.38 |
0.82 |
23.00 |
6.80 |
344.90 |
39.99 |
41.19 |
46.00 |
13.60 |
33.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WAN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRAHMS |
PHENIX |
PHOBOS |
STAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconstrained |
Constrained |
Unconstrained |
Constrained |
|
Unconstrained |
Constrained |
|
Unconstrained |
Constrained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
WAN Bandwidth requirements (MB/sec) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|