STAR Offline FTPC QA Reference Histograms - Run 5
This document explains the FTPC Offline QA reference histograms for the Year 2005 data runs.
For Year 2005, the EventQA histograms are divided into a set of
general histograms and one or more multiplicity/trigger class histograms.
In comparing the following page numbers and plots to
what you have in the actual QA postscript files for your specific
QA job, you may notice that things do not match page-by-page.
The actual set of QA histograms generated during reconstruction
depends on the set of Makers which are active in the chain. However,
all plots in the EventQA files should be described here but may not appear on the specified page.
The histograms shown here are for the P05id cuProductionMinBias run st_physics_6028013_raw_3030010. The postscript version of the Year 2005 QA reference histograms for this run
is available in
The offline QA histograms are used to monitor the calibration corrections and the
cluster and track finding parameters which are used in reconstruction.
Please report significant changes to the FTPC mailing list: ftpc-hn@www.star.bnl.gov
Janet Seyboth, Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich, Germany
March 28. 2006
Page Index for FTPC QA Reference Histograms
General histograms:
Page 1
Page 2
Multiplicity class histograms:
Point histograms:
Page 1
Page 3
Global track histograms:
Page 7
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Primary track histograms:
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Vertex histograms:
Page 18
Page 19
General Histograms
Page 1
Ratio of total charge in all reconstructed clusters in FTPC
East to West for low (solid line), mid (dashed line) and low
(dotted line) multiplicity events. Should be peaked at ~1.
Page 2
The real chargestep corresponds to the maximum drift time in FTPC West
(clusters from inner radius electrode) and is located near 170 timebins.
This position will change slightly with atmospheric pressure. The hits
beyond the step at timebin 170 are due to electronic noise. This step
should always be visable even if it is only a "blip".
The real chargestep corresponds to the maximum drift time in FTPC East
(clusters from inner radius electrode) and is located near 170 timebins.
This position will change slightly with atmospheric pressure. The hits
beyond the step at timebin 170 are due to electronic noise. This step
should always be visable even if it is only a "blip".
The cluster radial position histogram for FTPC East(red) and FTPC West(blue) should show the radius step at the inner radius (~7.8 cm). If the temperature and pressure corrections applied to the FTPC drift maps are correct, the inflection point of the distribution of cluster radial positions will coincide with the black vertical line at 7.8 cm.
Deviations of more than 1mm (2 bins) should be reported.
If one of the cluster radial position histograms is "flat", please check that the drift voltage reading for that FTPC is 10000.
Multiplicity Class Histograms
Point Histograms
Page 1
Distribution of number of reconstructed space points in
FTPC East (solid line) and West (dashed line). Should have
similar means and widths; scales with centrality,
depends on multiplicity cut for this set of plots
(i.e. low, medium or high).
Page 3
Radial distribution of reconstructed space points in FTPC East.
The distribution should be uniform. Dark areas are due to noise.
Ideally noisy pads are flagged in the FTPC gain tables so that they
are not used for cluster finding. Less densely populated areas
not on the sector boundaries are due to dead electronics. Empty areas
not on the sector boundaries indicates a serious hardware problem. An
FTPC expert should be contacted immediately if this is seen in
fast offline-QA during data taking.
Radial distribution of reconstructed space points in FTPC West.
The distribution should be uniform. Dark areas are due to noise.
Ideally noisy pads are flagged in the FTPC gain tables so that they
are not used for cluster finding. Less densely populated areas
not on the sector boundaries are due to dead electronics. Empty areas
not on the sector boundaries indicates a serious hardware problem. An
FTPC expert should be contacted immediately if this is seen in
fast offline-QA during data taking.
Distribution of reconstructed space points assigned to
tracks in FTPC East (solid line) and West (dashed line) with respect
to padrow number. The horizontal axis shows padrow numbers
where FTPC-West is 1-10 and FTPC-East is 11-20. Pads
#1 and #11 are closest to the center of STAR. East and West should
be similar in shape and magnitude.
Spikes indicate noisy electronics; dips indicate dead electronics.
Global Track Histograms
Page 7
Scatter plot of good global track multiplicities in FTPC West
versus FTPC East. Distribution should be correlated and lie
along the diagonal reference line. Magnitudes and widths depend on
trigger condition and multiplicity cut for this
set of plots (i.e. low, medium or high).
Page 11
Distribution of the number of fitted points on track
for FTPC-East (solid line) and FTPC-West (dashed line)
global tracks. Distributions should be similar within
statistics and peak at 10.
For year 2005 data, the distributions peak at 5 instead of 10.
This indicates that the cluster and track finding parameters need
tuning. We are working on this.
Page 12
Azimuthal distributions for track direction angle (psi) for
FTPC-East (solid line) and FTPC-West (dashed line) global tracks.
These should be similar and flat within statistics except for
the hexagonal FTPC sector structure which is visible at 30,90,150,210,270 and 330 degrees.
Holes are due to dead electronics.
Distributions of absolute value of pseudorapidity for
FTPC-East (solid line) and FTPC-West (dashed line) global tracks.
These should be similar within statistics and range from about
2.5 to 4.
Transverse momentum (GeV/c) distributions for
FTPC-East (solid line) and FTPC-West (dashed line) global tracks.
These should be similar within statistics.
Total momentum (GeV/c) distributions for
FTPC-East (solid line) and FTPC-West (dashed line) global tracks.
These should be similar within statistics.
Impact parameter (in cm) from primary vertex for
FTPC-East (solid line) and FTPC-West (dashed line) global tracks.
These should be similar within statistics.
Scatter plot of (x,y) coordinates for the first fitted
space points in FTPC-East global tracks.
These should be uniformly populated
with hits; FTPC hexagonal structure is apparent.
Page 13
Scatter plot of (x,y) coordinates for the first fitted
space points in FTPC-West global tracks.
These should be uniformly populated
with hits; FTPC hexagonal structure is apparent.
Primary Track Histograms
Page 13
Scatter plot of good primary track multiplicities in FTPC West
versus FTPC East. Distribution should be correlated and lie
along the reference diagonal line. Magnitudes and widths depend on
trigger condition and multiplicity cut for this
set of plots (i.e. low, medium or high).
Page 14
Mean transverse momentum distribution for FTPC-East (solid line)
and FTPC-West (dashed line) good primary tracks. These should be
similar within statistics and peak around 0.4 - 0.6 GeV/c but can
have broader distributions than for the SVT and TPC tracks.
Distribution of absolute value of mean pseudorapidity for FTPC-East
(solid line) and FTPC-West (dashed line) good primary tracks.
These should be similar within statistics and peak
around 3 - 3.5.
Page 15
Azimuthal distributions for track direction angle (psi) for
FTPC-East (solid line) and FTPC-West (dashed line) primary tracks.
These should be similar and flat within statistics except for
the hexagonal FTPC sector structure which is visible at 30,90,150,210,27
0 and 330 degrees.
Holes are due to dead electronics.
Page 16
Distributions of absolute value of pseudorapidity for
FTPC-East (solid line) and FTPC-West (dashed line) primary tracks.
These should be similar within statistics and range from about
2.5 to 4.
Transverse momentum (GeV/c) distributions for
FTPC-East (solid line) and FTPC-West (dashed line) primary tracks.
These should be similar within statistics.
Vertex Histograms
Page 18
Difference between x,y position of primary vertex reconstructed from tra
cks in FTPC East
and tracks from TPC. Ideally the distribution should peak at 0,0
Any significant deviation indicates a calibration problem and
should be reported
Difference between z position of primary vertex reconstructed from track
s in FTPC East
and tracks from TPC. Ideally the distribution should peak at 0
Any significant deviation indicates a calibration problem and
should be reported
Difference between x,y position of primary vertex reconstructed from tra
cks in FTPC West
and tracks from TPC. Ideally the distribution should peak at 0,0
Any significant deviation indicates a calibration problem and
should be reported
Page 19
Difference between z position of primary vertex reconstructed from track
s in FTPC West
and tracks from TPC. Ideally the distribution should peak at 0
Any significant deviation indicates a calibration problem and
should be reported