P07ib : CuCu200-MB-RFF

• |z vertex| < 5 cm.
• |&eta| < 1.2 (ssd coverage)
• N fitted points > 15.
• p_T > 0.1

ssd-svt hit efficiencies

Figure 1 : fitted vs possible hits in SSD	Figure 2 : fitted vs possible hits in SVT	Figure 3 : fitted vs possible hits in SVT-SSD

• ssd efficiency = 54.4 %
• svt efficiency :
  • 2 hits : 54.5 %
  • 3 hits : 44.5 %
• ssd+svt :
  • 2 hits : 49 %
  • 3 hits : 58 %
  • 4 hits : 47.6 %

ssd-svt hit efficiencies vs P

Figure : efficiency vs P

ssd-svt hit possible / fitted as a function of momentum P

Figure 4 : possible hits in SSD vs P	Figure 5 : fitted hits in SSD vs P	Figure 6 : possible hits in SVT-SSD vs P	Figure 7 : fitted hits in SVT-SSD vs P

&eta / &phi distribution of tracks with 1,2,3,4 silicon fitted hits

Figure 8 : &eta distribution	Figure 9 : &phi distribution

dca resolution

Figure 10 : &sigma(DCAXY) vs 1/P	Figure 11 : &sigma(DCAZ) vs 1/P

pull

Figure 12 : pullXY vs 1/pT	Figure 13 : pullXY vs 1/P	Figure 14 : pullZ vs 1/pT	Figure 15 : pullZ vs 1/P

P07ib : CuCu200-HT-RFF

• |z vertex| < 5 cm.
• |&eta| < 1.2 (ssd coverage)
• N fitted points > 15.
• p_T > 0.1

Figure 16 : Number of tracks per good events.

ssd-svt hit efficiencies

Figure 17 : fitted vs possible hits in SSD	Figure 18 : fitted vs possible hits in SVT	Figure 19 : fitted vs possible hits in SVT-SSD

• ssd efficiency = 49%
• svt efficiency :
  • 2 hits : 54%
  • 3 hits : 44.4%
• ssd+svt :
  • 2 hits : 48.2%
  • 3 hits : 55.3%
  • 4 hits : 46%

ssd-svt hit efficiencies vs P

Figure 20 : efficiency vs P

&eta / &phi distribution of tracks with 1,2,3,4 silicon fitted hits

Figure 21 : &eta distribution	Figure 22 : &phi distribution

dca resolution

Figure 23 : &sigma(DCAXY) vs 1/P	Figure 24 : &sigma(DCAZ) vs 1/P

pull

Figure 25 : pullXY vs 1/pT	Figure 26 : pullXY vs 1/P	Figure 27 : pullZ vs 1/pT	Figure 28 : pullZ vs 1/P

P07ib : CuCu200-HT-RFF low multiplicity

• |z vertex| < 5 cm.
• |&eta| < 1.2 (ssd coverage)
• N fitted points > 15.
• p_T > 0.1
• NoTracks (per event) < 50

Figure 29 : Number of tracks per good events.

ssd-svt hit efficiencies

Figure 30 : fitted vs possible hits in SSD	Figure 31 : fitted vs possible hits in SVT	Figure 32 : fitted vs possible hits in SVT-SSD

• ssd efficiency = 52.4 %
• svt efficiency :
  • 2 hits : 58.5 %
  • 3 hits : 47.5 %
• ssd+svt :
  • 2 hits : 54.7 %
  • 3 hits : 58.2 %
  • 4 hits : 47.5 %

ssd-svt hit efficiencies vs P

Figure 33 : efficiency vs P