Base QA DEV default vs increased hit errors 200 GeV AuAu

Webpage generated on 2015-12-06 17:57:54.572827

Abstract

Compare default and increased SST hit errors (in r/φ)

Summary

y2014a geometry, 200.0 GeV AuAu

Column 3: DEV, hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, whatever PXL, IST = 0
Column 4: DEV, hit errors, 100 μm, SSD = 1, whatever PXL, IST = 0

Legend

The plots are designed to address the following questions:

What tracks (globals and primaries) can be considered as "good" ones depending on total number of fit points and total number of bad points.
How do the track parameters and errors depend on the track kinematics, e.g. φ, η, 1/pT?
What are the dependencies of the pulls on the track kinematics?
Define the geometric acceptance for TPC tracks
What are the track reconstruction efficiencies for:
- Reconstruction efficiency for tracks which uniquely match one MC (true) track
- Clone rate, i.e. efficiency for tracks which match multiple MC tracks
- Loss rate, i.e. rate of MC tracks with no matched reconstructed track
- Ghost rate, i.e. rate of reconstructed tracks with no matched MC track
Marker styles: BLACK is positive. RED is negative. Circle = mean, Box = sigma.

Sections:

Average chi^2 vs no. fit points
Average chi^2 for all
Average chi^2 for pion
Global Deviation vs no. fit points (all or bad)
Global Deviation for All
Global Deviation for Pion
Global Pulls vs. no. fit points (all or bad)
Global Pulls for All
Global Pulls for Pion
Primary Deviation for All
Primary Deviation for Pion
Primary Pulls vs. no. fit points (all or bad)
Primary Pulls for All
Primary Pulls for Pion
Geometric Acceptance for tracks: N McHit ≥ 15. (Inner TPC has 3 MC hits / padrow.)
Efficiency over all. Only 1 RC track matched to MC track
Total efficiency over all (divided by acceptance). Only 1 RC track matched to MC track

hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 1 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 1 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 2 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 2 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 3 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 3 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 4 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 4 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 5 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 5 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 6 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 6 [up] [top] [link]

Average chi^2 for all

Fig. 7 Global track chi2 vs η
Fig. 8 Global track chi2 vs pT
Fig. 9 Global track chi2 vs φ
Fig. 10 Primary track chi2 vs η
Fig. 11 Primary track chi2 vs pT
Fig. 12 Primary track chi2 vs η
Fig. 13 chi2 to primary vertex vs φ
Fig. 14 chi2 to primary vertex vs pT
Fig. 15 chi2 to primary vertex vs φ

hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 7 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 7 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 8 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 8 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 9 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 9 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 10 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 10 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 11 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 11 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 12 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 12 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 13 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 13 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 14 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 14 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 15 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 15 [up] [top] [link]

Average chi^2 for pion

Fig. 16 Global track chi2 vs η
Fig. 17 Global track chi2 vs pT
Fig. 18 Global track chi2 vs φ
Fig. 19 Primary track chi2 vs η
Fig. 20 Primary track chi2 vs pT
Fig. 21 Primary track chi2 vs η
Fig. 22 chi2 to primary vertex vs φ
Fig. 23 chi2 to primary vertex vs pT
Fig. 24 chi2 to primary vertex vs φ

hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 16 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 16 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 17 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 17 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 18 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 18 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 19 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 19 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 20 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 20 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 21 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 21 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 22 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 22 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 23 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 23 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 24 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 24 [up] [top] [link]

Global Deviation vs no. fit points (all or bad)

Fig. 25 Global tracks fit difference in DCAxy vs N fit
Fig. 26 Global tracks fit difference in DCAxy vs N bad
Fig. 27 Global tracks fit difference in DCAz vs N fit
Fig. 28 Global tracks fit difference in DCAz vs N bad
Fig. 29 Global tracks fit difference in Ψ vs N fit
Fig. 30 Global tracks fit difference in Ψ vs N bad
Fig. 31 Global tracks fit difference in q/pT; vs N fit
Fig. 32 Global tracks fit difference in q/pT; vs N bad
Fig. 33 Global tracks fit difference in relative q/pT; vs N fit
Fig. 34 Global tracks fit difference in relative q/pT; vs N bad
Fig. 35 Global tracks fit difference in TAN(λ) vs N fit
Fig. 36 Global tracks fit difference in TAN(λ) vs N bad

hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 25 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 25 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 26 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 26 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 27 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 27 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 28 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 28 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 29 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 29 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 30 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 30 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 31 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 31 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 32 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 32 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 33 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 33 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 34 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 34 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 35 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 35 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 36 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 36 [up] [top] [link]

Global Deviation for All

Fig. 37 Global tracks fit difference in DCAxy vs η
Fig. 38 Global tracks fit difference in DCAxy vs pT
Fig. 39 Global tracks fit difference in DCAxy vs φ
Fig. 40 Global tracks fit difference in DCAz vs η
Fig. 41 Global tracks fit difference in DCAz vs pT
Fig. 42 Global tracks fit difference in DCAz vs φ
Fig. 43 Global tracks fit difference in Ψ vs η
Fig. 44 Global tracks fit difference in Ψ vs pT
Fig. 45 Global tracks fit difference in Ψ vs φ
Fig. 46 Global tracks fit difference in q/pT vs η
Fig. 47 Global tracks fit difference in q/pT vs pT
Fig. 48 Global tracks fit difference in q/pT vs φ
Fig. 49 Global tracks fit difference in relative q/pT vs η
Fig. 50 Global tracks fit difference in relative q/pT vs pT
Fig. 51 Global tracks fit difference in relative q/pT vs φ
Fig. 52 Global tracks fit difference in TAN(λ) vs η
Fig. 53 Global tracks fit difference in TAN(λ) vs pT
Fig. 54 Global tracks fit difference in TAN(λ) vs φ

hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 37 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 37 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 38 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 38 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 39 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 39 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 40 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 40 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 41 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 41 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 42 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 42 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 43 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 43 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 44 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 44 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 45 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 45 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 46 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 46 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 47 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 47 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 48 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 48 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 49 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 49 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 50 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 50 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 51 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 51 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 52 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 52 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 53 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 53 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 54 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 54 [up] [top] [link]

Global Deviation for Pion

Fig. 55 Global tracks fit difference in DCAxy vs η
Fig. 56 Global tracks fit difference in DCAxy vs pT
Fig. 57 Global tracks fit difference in DCAxy vs φ
Fig. 58 Global tracks fit difference in DCAz vs η
Fig. 59 Global tracks fit difference in DCAz vs pT
Fig. 60 Global tracks fit difference in DCAz vs φ
Fig. 61 Global tracks fit difference in Ψ vs η
Fig. 62 Global tracks fit difference in Ψ vs pT
Fig. 63 Global tracks fit difference in Ψ vs φ
Fig. 64 Global tracks fit difference in q/pT vs η
Fig. 65 Global tracks fit difference in q/pT vs pT
Fig. 66 Global tracks fit difference in q/pT vs φ
Fig. 67 Global tracks fit difference in relative q/pT vs η
Fig. 68 Global tracks fit difference in relative q/pT vs pT
Fig. 69 Global tracks fit difference in relative q/pT vs φ
Fig. 70 Global tracks fit difference in TAN(λ) vs η
Fig. 71 Global tracks fit difference in TAN(λ) vs pT
Fig. 72 Global tracks fit difference in TAN(λ) vs φ

hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 55 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 55 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 56 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 56 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 57 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 57 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 58 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 58 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 59 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 59 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 60 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 60 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 61 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 61 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 62 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 62 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 63 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 63 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 64 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 64 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 65 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 65 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 66 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 66 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 67 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 67 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 68 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 68 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 69 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 69 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 70 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 70 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 71 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 71 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 72 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 72 [up] [top] [link]

Global Pulls vs. no. fit points (all or bad)

Fig. 73 Global tracks pull in DCAxy vs η
Fig. 74 Global tracks pull in DCAxy vs pT
Fig. 75 Global tracks pull in DCAz vs η
Fig. 76 Global tracks pull in DCAz vs pT
Fig. 77 Global tracks pull in Ψ vs η
Fig. 78 Global tracks pull in Ψ vs pT
Fig. 79 Global tracks pull in q/pT vs η
Fig. 80 Global tracks pull in q/pT vs pT
Fig. 81 Global tracks pull in relative q/pT vs η
Fig. 82 Global tracks pull in relative q/pT vs pT
Fig. 83 Global tracks pull in TAN(λ) vs η
Fig. 84 Global tracks pull in TAN(λ) vs pT

hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 73 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 73 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 74 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 74 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 75 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 75 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 76 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 76 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 77 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 77 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 78 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 78 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 79 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 79 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 80 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 80 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 81 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 81 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 82 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 82 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 83 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 83 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 84 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 84 [up] [top] [link]

Global Pulls for All

Fig. 85 Global tracks fit pull in DCAxy vs η
Fig. 86 Global tracks fit pull in DCAxy vs pT
Fig. 87 Global tracks fit pull in DCAz vs η
Fig. 88 Global tracks fit pull in DCAz vs pT
Fig. 89 Global tracks fit pull in Ψ vs η
Fig. 90 Global tracks fit pull in Ψ vs pT
Fig. 91 Global tracks fit pull in q/pT vs η
Fig. 92 Global tracks fit pull in q/pT vs pT
Fig. 93 Global tracks fit pull in relative q/pT vs η
Fig. 94 Global tracks fit pull in relative q/pT vs pT
Fig. 95 Global tracks fit pull in TAN(λ) vs η
Fig. 96 Global tracks fit pull in TAN(λ) vs pT

hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 85 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 85 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 86 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 86 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 87 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 87 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 88 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 88 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 89 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 89 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 90 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 90 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 91 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 91 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 92 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 92 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 93 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 93 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 94 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 94 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 95 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 95 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 96 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 96 [up] [top] [link]

Global Pulls for Pion

Fig. 97 Global tracks fit pull in DCAxy vs η
Fig. 98 Global tracks fit pull in DCAxy vs pT
Fig. 99 Global tracks fit pull in DCAz vs η
Fig. 100 Global tracks fit pull in DCAz vs pT
Fig. 101 Global tracks fit pull in Ψ vs η
Fig. 102 Global tracks fit pull in Ψ vs pT
Fig. 103 Global tracks fit pull in q/pT vs η
Fig. 104 Global tracks fit pull in q/pT vs pT
Fig. 105 Global tracks fit pull in relative q/pT vs η
Fig. 106 Global tracks fit pull in relative q/pT vs pT
Fig. 107 Global tracks fit pull in TAN(λ) vs η
Fig. 108 Global tracks fit pull in TAN(λ) vs pT

hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 97 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 97 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 98 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 98 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 99 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 99 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 100 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 100 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 101 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 101 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 102 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 102 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 103 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 103 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 104 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 104 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 105 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 105 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 106 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 106 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 107 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 107 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 108 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 108 [up] [top] [link]

Primary Deviation for All

Fig. 109 Primary tracks fit difference in Ψ vs η
Fig. 110 Primary tracks fit difference in Ψ vs pT
Fig. 111 Primary tracks fit difference in Ψ vs φ
Fig. 112 Primary tracks fit difference in q/pT vs η
Fig. 113 Primary tracks fit difference in q/pT vs pT
Fig. 114 Primary tracks fit difference in q/pT vs φ
Fig. 115 Primary tracks fit difference in relative q/pT vs η
Fig. 116 Primary tracks fit difference in relative q/pT vs pT
Fig. 117 Primary tracks fit difference in relative q/pT vs φ

hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 109 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 109 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 110 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 110 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 111 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 111 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 112 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 112 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 113 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 113 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 114 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 114 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 115 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 115 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 116 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 116 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 117 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 117 [up] [top] [link]

Primary Deviation for Pion

Fig. 118 Primary tracks fit difference in Ψ vs η
Fig. 119 Primary tracks fit difference in Ψ vs pT
Fig. 120 Primary tracks fit difference in Ψ vs φ
Fig. 121 Primary tracks fit difference in q/pT vs η
Fig. 122 Primary tracks fit difference in q/pT vs pT
Fig. 123 Primary tracks fit difference in q/pT vs φ
Fig. 124 Primary tracks fit difference in relative q/pT vs η
Fig. 125 Primary tracks fit difference in relative q/pT vs pT
Fig. 126 Primary tracks fit difference in relative q/pT vs φ

hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 118 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 118 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 119 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 119 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 120 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 120 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 121 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 121 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 122 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 122 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 123 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 123 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 124 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 124 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 125 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 125 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 126 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 126 [up] [top] [link]

Primary Pulls vs. no. fit points (all or bad)

Fig. 127 Primary tracks pull in Ψ vs N fit
Fig. 128 Primary tracks pull in Ψ vs N bad
Fig. 129 Primary tracks pull in q/pT vs N fit
Fig. 130 Primary tracks pull in q/pT vs N bad
Fig. 131 Primary tracks pull in relative q/pT vs N fit
Fig. 132 Primary tracks pull in relative q/pT vs N bad
Fig. 133 Primary tracks pull in η vs N fit
Fig. 134 Primary tracks pull in η vs N bad

hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 127 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 127 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 128 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 128 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 129 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 129 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 130 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 130 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 131 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 131 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 132 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 132 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 133 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 133 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 134 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 134 [up] [top] [link]

Primary Pulls for All

Fig. 135 Primary tracks fit pull in Ψ vs η
Fig. 136 Primary tracks fit pull in Ψ vs pT
Fig. 137 Primary tracks fit pull in q/pT vs η
Fig. 138 Primary tracks fit pull in q/pT vs pT
Fig. 139 Primary tracks fit pull in relative q/pT vs η
Fig. 140 Primary tracks fit pull in relative q/pT vs pT
Fig. 141 Primary tracks fit pull in η vs η
Fig. 142 Primary tracks fit pull in η vs pT

hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 135 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 135 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 136 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 136 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 137 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 137 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 138 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 138 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 139 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 139 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 140 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 140 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 141 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 141 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 142 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 142 [up] [top] [link]

Primary Pulls for Pion

Fig. 143 Primary tracks fit pull in Ψ vs η
Fig. 144 Primary tracks fit pull in Ψ vs pT
Fig. 145 Primary tracks fit pull in q/pT vs η
Fig. 146 Primary tracks fit pull in q/pT vs pT
Fig. 147 Primary tracks fit pull in relative q/pT vs η
Fig. 148 Primary tracks fit pull in relative q/pT vs pT
Fig. 149 Primary tracks fit pull in η vs η
Fig. 150 Primary tracks fit pull in η vs pT

hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 143 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 143 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 144 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 144 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 145 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 145 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 146 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 146 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 147 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 147 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 148 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 148 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 149 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 149 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 150 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 150 [up] [top] [link]

Geometric Acceptance for tracks: N McHit ≥ 15. (Inner TPC has 3 MC hits / padrow.)

Fig. 151 Geometric acceptance for global tracks vs φ for |η| < 1 and pT > 0.11 GeV
Fig. 152 Geometric acceptance for global tracks vs η for pT > 0.11 GeV
Fig. 153 Geometric acceptance for global tracks vs z for |η| < 1 and pT > 0.11 GeV
Fig. 154 Geometric acceptance for primary tracks vs φ for |η| < 1 and pT > 0.11 GeV
Fig. 155 Geometric acceptance for primary tracks vs η for pT > 0.11 GeV
Fig. 156 Geometric acceptance for primary tracks vs z for |η| < 1 and pT > 0.11 GeV

hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 151 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 151 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 152 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 152 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 153 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 153 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 154 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 154 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 155 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 155 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 156 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 156 [up] [top] [link]

Efficiency over all. Only 1 RC track matched to MC track

Fig. 157 Geometric acceptance for global tracks vs φ for |η| < 1 and pT > 0.11 GeV
Fig. 158 Geometric acceptance for global tracks vs η for pT > 0.11 GeV
Fig. 159 Geometric acceptance for global tracks vs z for |η| < 1 and pT > 0.11 GeV
Fig. 160 Geometric acceptance for primary tracks vs φ for |η| < 1 and pT > 0.11 GeV
Fig. 161 Geometric acceptance for primary tracks vs η for pT > 0.11 GeV
Fig. 162 Geometric acceptance for primary tracks vs z for |η| < 1 and pT > 0.11 GeV

hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 157 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 157 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 158 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 158 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 159 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 159 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 160 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 160 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 161 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 161 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 162 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 162 [up] [top] [link]

Total efficiency over all (divided by acceptance). Only 1 RC track matched to MC track

Fig. 163 Geometric acceptance for global tracks vs φ for |η| < 1 and pT > 0.11 GeV
Fig. 164 Geometric acceptance for global tracks vs η for pT > 0.11 GeV
Fig. 165 Geometric acceptance for global tracks vs z for |η| < 1 and pT > 0.11 GeV
Fig. 166 Geometric acceptance for primary tracks vs φ for |η| < 1 and pT > 0.11 GeV
Fig. 167 Geometric acceptance for primary tracks vs η for pT > 0.11 GeV
Fig. 168 Geometric acceptance for primary tracks vs z for |η| < 1 and pT > 0.11 GeV

hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 163 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 163 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 164 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 164 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 165 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 165 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 166 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 166 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 167 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 167 [up] [top] [link]
hit errors 30 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0	hit errors 100 μm, SSD = 1, PXL, IST = 0
Fig. 168 [up] [top] [link]	Fig. 168 [up] [top] [link]