MIP response for M-C vs. real data
side-by-side comparisons

  1. INPUTS:
    A) 750K real pp200 minB events (used in ETOW calibration)
    B) 500K PYTHIA events with pt=2-3, production 'rcf1231', the softest I found.
    ETOW ADC scale set by 4096 @60 GeV Et w/ SF=5%, pre & post gains are EQUAL @23000 ch/1GeV energy lose.
    B-1) slow simulator, default settings
    B-2) fast simulator
    C) 1 muons per eve, 100 eve, pT=20 GeV, aimed at tower 03TC10, fast simulator

  2. Response of one tower 03TC10 & pre & post-shower.
    Black=raw spectra. Red MIP condition on all except this element. Hash blue - 6-fold MIP condition.
    R is the ration between hash-blue & red
    real pp200. M-C , slow sim . M-C , fast sim . 1 muon per eve, fast sim
    MIPs yield per tower = 48/750K MIPs yield per tower= 74/500K MIPs yield per tower= 144/500KMIPs yield per tower= 91/100eve
    . . .

    Remarks:
    * slow simu does not smear pedestals for zero supressed pre/post channels.
    * MIP yields per input events agree within a factor of 2
    * post hower ADC's in M-C are twice higher than in real data

  3. Response of SMD on plain 3V
    Energy sum from pair of strips in on X-axis. The X range is frozen to [0,5] MeV. Each plot shows 12 consecutive pair is strips.
    Landau is fitted to each spectrum. The last two plots in the last row show distribution of the Landau mean (X=0-3 MeV) and 'sigma' (X=0-1 MeV)
    Distribution of MPV vs. strip ID is shown in the second row of the table
    real pp200 . M-C , slow sim . M-C , fast sim
    . .
    . .

    Remarks:
    * Absolute SMD gains changed from 1.3 (blue line) to 1.4(red line) for real cucu200 vs. pp200 events.
    * Absolute scale of SMD gains is wrong. Needed gain correction is of ~1.5
    * Despite slow simu being ON the real spectra are ~2x wider.
    * Slow simu des not change gains but broadens the spectra, stil not enouh

  4. Response of SMD averaged over many plains. Blue line was the goal.
    ratio real/MC real pp200 . M-C , slow sim
    1.46 .
    1.40 .
    1.45 .
    1.53 .
    1.46 .
    1.48 .
    Avr=1.46

  5. Distribution of UxV points - the crose is ~not visible
    real pp200. M-C , slow sim

  6. Absolute pre/post gains. Note, the input gain for M-C was of 23000 ch/GeV for pre & post.
    layer M-C , slow sim
    Pres1
    Pres2
    Post

  7. Absolute tower gains reco for M-C events. The input eta dependent gains for M-C are marked by the blue lines.

  8. M-C spectra for all pre/post/towers in sectors 1-3
    pres-1 spectra
    pres-2 spectra
    postshower spectra
    tower spectra