Reconstruction versus Simulation
Legend
The plots are designed to answer on the following questions:
- What tracks (globals and primaries) can be considered as "good" ones depending on total no. of fit points and no. of bad hits ?
- What is the track parameters and their errors dependence on the track kinematics (φ, η, 1/pT) ?
- What is the track parameter pulls dependence on above kinematics ?
- What is the track reconstruction efficiencies for :
- Geometrical acceptance (MC only),
- Reconstruction efficiency for track with only match between MC and RC
- Clones, for multiple (>1) match between single MC track to RC one,
- Lost tracks, MC tracks which have no RC partner.
- Ghost tracks, RC tracks which have no MC partner.
- Color scheme: • Positive and • Negative Tracks.
- Results of Gauss fit for slices are presented as • for μ and as box for σ.
- Chi2 versus no. fit points (all or bad) Fig.1, Fig.2, Fig.3, Fig.4, Fig.5, Fig.6
- Chi2 for All Fig.7, Fig.8, Fig.9, Fig.10, Fig.11, Fig.12
- Globals Deviation versus no. fit points (all or bad) Fig.19, Fig.20, Fig.21, Fig.22, Fig.23, Fig.24, Fig.25, Fig.26, Fig.27, Fig.28, Fig.29, Fig.30
- Globals Deviation for All Fig.31, Fig.32, Fig.33, Fig.34, Fig.35, Fig.36, Fig.37, Fig.38, Fig.39, Fig.40, Fig.41, Fig.42
- Globals Pulls versus no. fit points (all or bad) Fig.55, Fig.56, Fig.57, Fig.58, Fig.59, Fig.60, Fig.61, Fig.62, Fig.63, Fig.64, Fig.65, Fig.66
- Globals Pulls for All Fig.67, Fig.68, Fig.69, Fig.70, Fig.71, Fig.72, Fig.73, Fig.74, Fig.75, Fig.76, Fig.77, Fig.78
- Primaries Deviation versus no. fit points (all or bad) Fig.91, Fig.92, Fig.93, Fig.94, Fig.95, Fig.96, Fig.97, Fig.98
- Primaries Deviation for All Fig.99, Fig.100, Fig.101, Fig.102, Fig.103, Fig.104, Fig.105, Fig.106
- Primaries Pulls versus no. fit points (all or bad) Fig.115, Fig.116, Fig.117, Fig.118, Fig.119, Fig.120, Fig.121, Fig.122
- Primaries Pulls for All Fig.123, Fig.124, Fig.125, Fig.126, Fig.127, Fig.128, Fig.129, Fig.130
- Geometrical acceptance (no. of McHit >= 15 (Inner Tpc has 3 MC hits per row) :
- Efficiency over all (only one RC track matched) :
- Efficiency with respect to Geometrical acceptance (only one RC track matched) :
- Clone (more than one RC track matched) over all :
- Clone (more than one RC track matched) with respect to Geometrical acceptance :
- Lost (no RC track matched) over all :
- Lost (no RC track matched) with respect to Geometrical acceptance :
- Ghost (no MC track matched) over all :
- Ghost (no MC track matched) with respect to Geometrical acceptance :
| y2011_AuAu200 |
y2015FixedTarget |
Fig.19,
Fig.19 |
 |
Fig.20,
Fig.20 |
 |
Fig.21,
Fig.21 |
 |
Fig.22,
Fig.22 |
 |
Fig.23,
Fig.23 |
 |
Fig.24,
Fig.24 |
 |
Fig.25,
Fig.25 |
 |
Fig.26,
Fig.26 |
 |
Fig.27,
Fig.27 |
 |
Fig.28,
Fig.28 |
 |
Fig.29,
Fig.29 |
 |
Fig.30,
Fig.30 |
 |
| y2011_AuAu200 |
y2015FixedTarget |
Fig.31,
Fig.31 |
 |
Fig.32,
Fig.32 |
 |
Fig.33,
Fig.33 |
 |
Fig.34,
Fig.34 |
 |
Fig.35,
Fig.35 |
 |
Fig.36,
Fig.36 |
 |
Fig.37,
Fig.37 |
 |
Fig.38,
Fig.38 |
 |
Fig.39,
Fig.39 |
 |
Fig.40,
Fig.40 |
 |
Fig.41,
Fig.41 |
 |
Fig.42,
Fig.42 |
 |
| y2011_AuAu200 |
y2015FixedTarget |
Fig.55,
Fig.55 |
 |
Fig.56,
Fig.56 |
 |
Fig.57,
Fig.57 |
 |
Fig.58,
Fig.58 |
 |
Fig.59,
Fig.59 |
 |
Fig.60,
Fig.60 |
 |
Fig.61,
Fig.61 |
 |
Fig.62,
Fig.62 |
 |
Fig.63,
Fig.63 |
 |
Fig.64,
Fig.64 |
 |
Fig.65,
Fig.65 |
 |
Fig.66,
Fig.66 |
 |
| y2011_AuAu200 |
y2015FixedTarget |
Fig.67,
Fig.67 |
 |
Fig.68,
Fig.68 |
 |
Fig.69,
Fig.69 |
 |
Fig.70,
Fig.70 |
 |
Fig.71,
Fig.71 |
 |
Fig.72,
Fig.72 |
 |
Fig.73,
Fig.73 |
 |
Fig.74,
Fig.74 |
 |
Fig.75,
Fig.75 |
 |
Fig.76,
Fig.76 |
 |
Fig.77,
Fig.77 |
 |
Fig.78,
Fig.78 |
 |
Yuri Fisyak
Last modified: Thu Jun 25 16:49:02 EDT 2015
