Track by track analysis

Legend

Compare 26p5GeV_fixedTarget 2020 (run 21211028) samples /star/data03/pwg/harasty/FXT_PICO/Calibrated (new, use tpcBXT0CorrEPD.20200730.015354.C) and /star/data03/pwg/harasty/FXT_PICO/Uncalibrated (old)

The plots are designed to answer on the following questions:

• What globals and primaries track relative reconstruction efficiency of "new" production with respect to "old" one ?
• What is the track parameters and their errors dependence on the track kinematics (φ, η, 1/pT) ?

• Filled marker for "new" production, opened marker for "old" one.
• Black marker for positive tracks, Red markers for negative tracks.

• The Efficiency is calculated forthe matched tracks i.e. tracks has one to one match or if there is a multiple match than it is taken the first matched pair only.
• The clones are tracks with more than 1 matched track.
• The lost track are ones without match.

• Colomn encoding : Year"old"_"new" => 2020_dev_.DEV2, datasample from year 2020, old = "dev" (fast offline), new = ".DEV2" (TFG)

1. Tracks

Track by track analysis

26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.1
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.2
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.3
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.4
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.5
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.6
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.7
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.8
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.9
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.10
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.11
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.12
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.13
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.14
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.15
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.16
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.17
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.18
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.19
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.20
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.21
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.22
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.23
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.24
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.25
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.26
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.27
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.28
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.29
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.30
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.31
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.32
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.33
26GeVp5FXT_uncal_cal
Fig.34