Comparison of different iTpx configurations

   y2014c      0.335 x 1.15 => 13 => Total no. of pads per inner sector      1750 dev
   devTA       0.670 x 2.00 => 32 => Total no. of pads per inner sector      2162
   devTB       0.670 x 1.60 => 40 => Total no. of pads per inner sector      2572
   devTC       0.500 x 1.60 => 40 => Total no. of pads per inner sector      3496
   devTD       0.500 x 2.00 => 32 => Total no. of pads per inner sector      2762
   devTE       0.335 x 1.28 => 50 => Total no. of pads per inner sector      6494
   devTF       0.400 x 2.00 => 32 => Total no. of pads per inner sector      3456
   devTX       0.500 x 1.60 => 40 => Total no. of pads per inner sector      3580, Tonko 09/05/14
  • Chi2 versus no. fit points (all or bad) Fig.1, Fig.2, Fig.3, Fig.4, Fig.5, Fig.6
  • Chi2 for All Fig.7, Fig.8, Fig.9, Fig.10, Fig.11, Fig.12
  • Chi2 for pion Fig.13, Fig.14, Fig.15, Fig.16, Fig.17, Fig.18
  • Globals Deviation versus no. fit points (all or bad) Fig.19, Fig.20, Fig.21, Fig.22, Fig.23, Fig.24, Fig.25, Fig.26, Fig.27, Fig.28, Fig.29, Fig.30
  • Globals Deviation for All Fig.31, Fig.32, Fig.33, Fig.34, Fig.35, Fig.36, Fig.37, Fig.38, Fig.39, Fig.40, Fig.41, Fig.42
  • Globals Deviation for pion Fig.43, Fig.44, Fig.45, Fig.46, Fig.47, Fig.48, Fig.49, Fig.50, Fig.51, Fig.52, Fig.53, Fig.54
  • Globals Pulls versus no. fit points (all or bad) Fig.55, Fig.56, Fig.57, Fig.58, Fig.59, Fig.60, Fig.61, Fig.62, Fig.63, Fig.64, Fig.65, Fig.66
  • Globals Pulls for All Fig.67, Fig.68, Fig.69, Fig.70, Fig.71, Fig.72, Fig.73, Fig.74, Fig.75, Fig.76, Fig.77, Fig.78
  • Globals Pulls for pion Fig.79, Fig.80, Fig.81, Fig.82, Fig.83, Fig.84, Fig.85, Fig.86, Fig.87, Fig.88, Fig.89, Fig.90
  • Primaries Deviation versus no. fit points (all or bad) Fig.91, Fig.92, Fig.93, Fig.94, Fig.95, Fig.96, Fig.97, Fig.98
  • Primaries Deviation for All Fig.99, Fig.100, Fig.101, Fig.102, Fig.103, Fig.104, Fig.105, Fig.106
  • Primaries Deviation for pion Fig.107, Fig.108, Fig.109, Fig.110, Fig.111, Fig.112, Fig.113, Fig.114
  • Primaries Pulls versus no. fit points (all or bad) Fig.115, Fig.116, Fig.117, Fig.118, Fig.119, Fig.120, Fig.121, Fig.122
  • Primaries Pulls for All Fig.123, Fig.124, Fig.125, Fig.126, Fig.127, Fig.128, Fig.129, Fig.130
  • Primaries Pulls for pion Fig.131, Fig.132, Fig.133, Fig.134, Fig.135, Fig.136, Fig.137, Fig.138
  • Geometrical acceptance (no. of McHit >= 15 (Inner Tpc has 3 MC hits per row) :
  • Efficiency over all (only one RC track matched) :
  • Efficiency with respect to Geometrical acceptance (only one RC track matched) :
  • Clone (more than one RC track matched) over all :
  • Clone (more than one RC track matched) with respect to Geometrical acceptance :
  • Lost (no RC track matched) over all :
  • Lost (no RC track matched) with respect to Geometrical acceptance :
  • Ghost (no MC track matched) over all :
  • Ghost (no MC track matched) with respect to Geometrical acceptance :

    • Average Chisq versus no. fit points (all or bad)

    Fig.1, Fig.2, Fig.3, Fig.4, Fig.5, Fig.6,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.1
    Fig.2
    Fig.3
    Fig.4
    Fig.5
    Fig.6

    Average Chisq for All

    Fig.7, Fig.8, Fig.9, Fig.10, Fig.11, Fig.12,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.7
    Fig.8
    Fig.9
    Fig.10
    Fig.11
    Fig.12

    Average Chisq for pion

    Fig.13, Fig.14, Fig.15, Fig.16, Fig.17, Fig.18,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.13
    Fig.14
    Fig.15
    Fig.16
    Fig.17
    Fig.18

    Globals Deviation versus no. fit points (all or bad)

    Fig.19, Fig.20, Fig.21, Fig.22, Fig.23, Fig.24, Fig.25, Fig.26, Fig.27, Fig.28, Fig.29, Fig.30,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.19
    Fig.20
    Fig.21
    Fig.22
    Fig.23
    Fig.24
    Fig.25
    Fig.26
    Fig.27
    Fig.28
    Fig.29
    Fig.30

    Globals Deviation for All

    Fig.31, Fig.32, Fig.33, Fig.34, Fig.35, Fig.36, Fig.37, Fig.38, Fig.39, Fig.40, Fig.41, Fig.42,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.31
    Fig.32
    Fig.33
    Fig.34
    Fig.35
    Fig.36
    Fig.37
    Fig.38
    Fig.39
    Fig.40
    Fig.41
    Fig.42

    Globals Deviation for pion

    Fig.43, Fig.44, Fig.45, Fig.46, Fig.47, Fig.48, Fig.49, Fig.50, Fig.51, Fig.52, Fig.53, Fig.54,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.43
    Fig.44
    Fig.45
    Fig.46
    Fig.47
    Fig.48
    Fig.49
    Fig.50
    Fig.51
    Fig.52
    Fig.53
    Fig.54

    Globals Pulls versus no. fit points (all or bad)

    Fig.55, Fig.56, Fig.57, Fig.58, Fig.59, Fig.60, Fig.61, Fig.62, Fig.63, Fig.64, Fig.65, Fig.66,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.55
    Fig.56
    Fig.57
    Fig.58
    Fig.59
    Fig.60
    Fig.61
    Fig.62
    Fig.63
    Fig.64
    Fig.65
    Fig.66

    Globals Pulls for All

    Fig.67, Fig.68, Fig.69, Fig.70, Fig.71, Fig.72, Fig.73, Fig.74, Fig.75, Fig.76, Fig.77, Fig.78,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.67
    Fig.68
    Fig.69
    Fig.70
    Fig.71
    Fig.72
    Fig.73
    Fig.74
    Fig.75
    Fig.76
    Fig.77
    Fig.78

    Globals Pulls for pion

    Fig.79, Fig.80, Fig.81, Fig.82, Fig.83, Fig.84, Fig.85, Fig.86, Fig.87, Fig.88, Fig.89, Fig.90,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.79
    Fig.80
    Fig.81
    Fig.82
    Fig.83
    Fig.84
    Fig.85
    Fig.86
    Fig.87
    Fig.88
    Fig.89
    Fig.90

    Primaries Deviation versus no. fit points (all or bad)

    Fig.91, Fig.92, Fig.93, Fig.94, Fig.95, Fig.96, Fig.97, Fig.98,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.91
    Fig.92
    Fig.93
    Fig.94
    Fig.95
    Fig.96
    Fig.97
    Fig.98

    Primaries Deviation for All

    Fig.99, Fig.100, Fig.101, Fig.102, Fig.103, Fig.104, Fig.105, Fig.106,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.99
    Fig.100
    Fig.101
    Fig.102
    Fig.103
    Fig.104
    Fig.105
    Fig.106

    Primaries Deviation for pion

    Fig.107, Fig.108, Fig.109, Fig.110, Fig.111, Fig.112, Fig.113, Fig.114,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.107
    Fig.108
    Fig.109
    Fig.110
    Fig.111
    Fig.112
    Fig.113
    Fig.114

    Primaries Pulls versus no. fit points (all or bad)

    Fig.115, Fig.116, Fig.117, Fig.118, Fig.119, Fig.120, Fig.121, Fig.122,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.115
    Fig.116
    Fig.117
    Fig.118
    Fig.119
    Fig.120
    Fig.121
    Fig.122

    Primaries Pulls for All

    Fig.123, Fig.124, Fig.125, Fig.126, Fig.127, Fig.128, Fig.129, Fig.130,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.123
    Fig.124
    Fig.125
    Fig.126
    Fig.127
    Fig.128
    Fig.129
    Fig.130

    Primaries Pulls for pion

    Fig.131, Fig.132, Fig.133, Fig.134, Fig.135, Fig.136, Fig.137, Fig.138,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.131
    Fig.132
    Fig.133
    Fig.134
    Fig.135
    Fig.136
    Fig.137
    Fig.138

    Geometrical acceptance (no. of McHit >= 15 (Inner Tpc has 3 MC hits per row)

    Fig.139, Fig.140, Fig.141, Fig.142, Fig.143, Fig.144,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.139
    Fig.140
    Fig.141
    Fig.142
    Fig.143
    Fig.144

    Efficiency over all (only one RC track matched)

    Fig.145, Fig.146, Fig.147, Fig.148, Fig.149, Fig.150,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.145
    Fig.146
    Fig.147
    Fig.148
    Fig.149
    Fig.150

    Effeciency with respect to Geometrical acceptance (only one RC track matched)

    Fig.151, Fig.152, Fig.153, Fig.154, Fig.155, Fig.156,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.151
    Fig.152
    Fig.153
    Fig.154
    Fig.155
    Fig.156

    Clone (more than one RC track matched) over all

    wFig.157, Fig.158, Fig.159, Fig.160, Fig.161, Fig.162,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.157
    Fig.158
    Fig.159
    Fig.160
    Fig.161
    Fig.162

    Clone (more than one RC track matched) with respect to Geometrical acceptance

    Fig.163, Fig.164, Fig.165, Fig.166, Fig.167, Fig.168,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.163
    Fig.164
    Fig.165
    Fig.166
    Fig.167
    Fig.168

    Lost (no RC track matched) over all

    Fig.169, Fig.170, Fig.171, Fig.172, Fig.173, Fig.174,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.169
    Fig.170
    Fig.171
    Fig.172
    Fig.173
    Fig.174

    Lost (no RC track matched) with respect to Geometrical acceptance

    Fig.175, Fig.176, Fig.177, Fig.178, Fig.179, Fig.180,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.175
    Fig.176
    Fig.177
    Fig.178
    Fig.179
    Fig.180

    Ghost (no MC track matched) over all

    Fig.181, Fig.182, Fig.183, Fig.184, Fig.185, Fig.186,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.181
    Fig.182
    Fig.183
    Fig.184
    Fig.185
    Fig.186

    Ghost (no MC track matched) with respect to Geometrical acceptance

    Fig.187, Fig.188, Fig.189, Fig.190, Fig.191, Fig.192,
    y2014c devtA devtB devtC devtD devtF devtX
    Fig.187
    Fig.188
    Fig.189
    Fig.190
    Fig.191
    Fig.192

    Yuri Fisyak
    Last modified: Wed Oct 8 19:22:25 EDT 2014