2013 pp510 Reconstruction versus Simulation

Legend

The plots are designed to answer on the following questions:

• What tracks (globals and primaries) can be considered as "good" ones depending on total no. of fit points and no. of bad hits ?
• What is the track parameters and their errors dependence on the track kinematics (φ, η, 1/pT) ?
• What is the track parameter pulls dependence on above kinematics ?
• What is the track reconstruction efficiencies for :
• Geometrical acceptance (MC only),
• Reconstruction efficiency for track with only match between MC and RC
• Clones, for multiple (>1) match between single MC track to RC one,
• Lost tracks, MC tracks which have no RC partner.
• Ghost tracks, RC tracks which have no MC partner.
• Color scheme:  • Positive and  • Negative Tracks.
• Results of Gauss fit for slices are presented as • for μ and as box for σ.

• Globals Deviation versus no. fit points (all or bad) Fig.19, Fig.20, Fig.21, Fig.22, Fig.23, Fig.24, Fig.25, Fig.26, Fig.27, Fig.28, Fig.29, Fig.30
• Globals Deviation for All Fig.31, Fig.32, Fig.33, Fig.34, Fig.35, Fig.36, Fig.37, Fig.38, Fig.39, Fig.40, Fig.41, Fig.42
• Globals Pulls versus no. fit points (all or bad) Fig.55, Fig.56, Fig.57, Fig.58, Fig.59, Fig.60, Fig.61, Fig.62, Fig.63, Fig.64, Fig.65, Fig.66
• Globals Pulls for All Fig.67, Fig.68, Fig.69, Fig.70, Fig.71, Fig.72, Fig.73, Fig.74, Fig.75, Fig.76, Fig.77, Fig.78
• Primaries Deviation versus no. fit points (all or bad) Fig.91, Fig.92, Fig.93, Fig.94, Fig.95, Fig.96, Fig.97, Fig.98
• Primaries Deviation for All Fig.99, Fig.100, Fig.101, Fig.102, Fig.103, Fig.104, Fig.105, Fig.106
• Primaries Pulls versus no. fit points (all or bad) Fig.115, Fig.116, Fig.117, Fig.118, Fig.119, Fig.120, Fig.121, Fig.122
• Primaries Pulls for All Fig.123, Fig.124, Fig.125, Fig.126, Fig.127, Fig.128, Fig.129, Fig.130
• Geometrical acceptance (no. of McHit >= 15 (Inner Tpc has 3 MC hits per row) :
  • Global tracks: Fig.139, Fig.140, Fig.141
  • Primary tracks: Fig.142, Fig.143, Fig.144
• Primary tracks: Fig.148, Fig.149, Fig.150

Average Chisq versus no. fit points (all or bad)

SL15 Sti PPV	SL15 StiCA PPV	SL15 StiCA KFV	.DEV2 StiCA KFV (no pileup)
Fig.1
Fig.2
Fig.3
Fig.4
Fig.5
Fig.6

Average Chisq for All

SL15 Sti PPV	SL15 StiCA PPV	SL15 StiCA KFV	.DEV2 StiCA KFV (no pileup)
Fig.7
Fig.8
Fig.9
Fig.10
Fig.11
Fig.12

Globals Deviation versus no. fit points (all or bad)

SL15 Sti PPV	SL15 StiCA PPV	SL15 StiCA KFV	.DEV2 StiCA KFV (no pileup)
Fig.19
Fig.20
Fig.21
Fig.22
Fig.23
Fig.24
Fig.25
Fig.26
Fig.27
Fig.28
Fig.29
Fig.30

Globals Deviation for All

SL15 Sti PPV	SL15 StiCA PPV	SL15 StiCA KFV	.DEV2 StiCA KFV (no pileup)
Fig.31
Fig.32
Fig.33
Fig.34
Fig.35
Fig.36
Fig.37
Fig.38
Fig.39
Fig.40
Fig.41
Fig.42

Globals Pulls versus no. fit points (all or bad)

SL15 Sti PPV	SL15 StiCA PPV	SL15 StiCA KFV	.DEV2 StiCA KFV (no pileup)
Fig.55
Fig.56
Fig.57
Fig.58
Fig.59
Fig.60
Fig.61
Fig.62
Fig.63
Fig.64
Fig.65
Fig.66

Globals Pulls for All

SL15 Sti PPV	SL15 StiCA PPV	SL15 StiCA KFV	.DEV2 StiCA KFV (no pileup)
Fig.67
Fig.68
Fig.69
Fig.70
Fig.71
Fig.72
Fig.73
Fig.74
Fig.75
Fig.76
Fig.77
Fig.78

Primaries Deviation versus no. fit points (all or bad)

SL15 Sti PPV	SL15 StiCA PPV	SL15 StiCA KFV	.DEV2 StiCA KFV (no pileup)
Fig.91
Fig.92
Fig.93
Fig.94
Fig.95
Fig.96
Fig.97
Fig.98

Primaries Deviation for All

SL15 Sti PPV	SL15 StiCA PPV	SL15 StiCA KFV	.DEV2 StiCA KFV (no pileup)
Fig.99
Fig.100
Fig.101
Fig.102
Fig.103
Fig.104
Fig.105
Fig.106

Primaries Pulls versus no. fit points (all or bad)

SL15 Sti PPV	SL15 StiCA PPV	SL15 StiCA KFV	.DEV2 StiCA KFV (no pileup)
Fig.115
Fig.116
Fig.117
Fig.118
Fig.119
Fig.120
Fig.121
Fig.122

Primaries Pulls for All

SL15 Sti PPV	SL15 StiCA PPV	SL15 StiCA KFV	.DEV2 StiCA KFV (no pileup)
Fig.123
Fig.124
Fig.125
Fig.126
Fig.127
Fig.128
Fig.129
Fig.130

Global track efficiency with respect to Geometrical acceptance (only one RC track matched)

SL15 Sti PPV	SL15 StiCA PPV	SL15 StiCA KFV	.DEV2 StiCA KFV (no pileup)
Fig.151
Fig.152
Fig.153

Primary track efficiency with respect to Geometrical acceptance (only one RC track matched)

SL15 Sti PPV	SL15 StiCA PPV	SL15 StiCA KFV	.DEV2 StiCA KFV (no pileup)
Fig.154
Fig.155
Fig.156

Global track clone (more than one RC track matched) with respect to Geometrical acceptance

SL15 Sti PPV	SL15 StiCA PPV	SL15 StiCA KFV	.DEV2 StiCA KFV (no pileup)
Fig.163
Fig.164
Fig.165

Primary track clone (more than one RC track matched) with respect to Geometrical acceptance

SL15 Sti PPV	SL15 StiCA PPV	SL15 StiCA KFV	.DEV2 StiCA KFV (no pileup)
Fig.166
Fig.167
Fig.168

Global track lost (no RC track matched) with respect to Geometrical acceptance

SL15 Sti PPV	SL15 StiCA PPV	SL15 StiCA KFV	.DEV2 StiCA KFV (no pileup)
Fig.175
Fig.176
Fig.177

Primary track lost (no RC track matched) with respect to Geometrical acceptance

SL15 Sti PPV	SL15 StiCA PPV	SL15 StiCA KFV	.DEV2 StiCA KFV (no pileup)
Fig.178
Fig.179
Fig.180

Primary track ghost (no MC track matched) with respect to Geometrical acceptance

SL15 Sti PPV	SL15 StiCA PPV	SL15 StiCA KFV	.DEV2 StiCA KFV (no pileup)
Fig.190
Fig.191
Fig.192