From: Frank Geurts (geurts_at_rice.edu)
Date: Fri May 09 2003 - 13:16:19 EDT
Geary,
we are happy to do so after we have set up the basic framework ...but
i don't think it makes sense confusing a lot of people of that list by
dropping these emails in that tof list. The current list of people is
the development core and these emails are quick exchanges, nothing
"official".
Apart from Bill's request to update everybody on during the next phone
mtng, I'll prepare a status report for the hypernews list so everybody
on that list is still well informed w/o the need to work through the
many emails and details that we are discussing.
thanks,
frank
Geary Eppley wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I wonder if it wouldn't be better to have discussion of TOF software
> infrastructure on the startof-hn list?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Geary
>
>
> On Wed, 7 May 2003 dongx_at_mail.ustc.edu.cn wrote:
>
>
>>Hi, Frank:
>> Dr. Wu and I have modified the MuDstMaker code for TOF microdst data.
>>We have two versions now :) You may look at the directory
>> /star/u/dongx/work/TOFr/MicroDst-bak and MicroDst-bak1
>>In the first version, MicroDst-bak/ , we assume the StTofHit in StEvent
>>has been updated ( just in StRoot/StEvent ), and we fill them in the
>>analysis maker (StTofrSimMaker, which should be renamed actually), and
>>then dump them into TCloneArrays in StMuDstMaker.
>>In the second one, MicroDst-bak1/ , we just use the StEvent in lib now,
>>and add StMuTofCollection, StMuTofHitCollection and StMuTofHit in
>>MuDstMaker directory. Here StMuTofHit is very similar to the coming
>>StTofHit. And we also fill StMuTofCollection in analysis maker and fill
>>them into Micro Dst event in StMuDstMaker.
>>These two both work well, I think. You may have a look at the most recent
>>MuDst.root file in the corresponding directory.
>>In either of these two, we need the analysis maker to give sufficient
>>information according to the coming StTofHit, which means data should be
>>calibrated already before filled into StTofCollection/StMuTofCollection.
>>Would you please have a check before sent to the software guys? And also
>>you should add the tofp analysis maker if you need.
>>
>>I think we should make clear for our TOF softwares now, including
>>TofCollection in StEvent, TofMaker(analysis tofp/tofr),
>>TofSimMaker(tofp/tofr), TofUtil( geometry, parameters etc.), MiniDstMaker,
>>MicroDstMaker, embedding maker etc. Which can be put into lib now? Which
>>needs modification? and what we need more?
>>
>>Any comments or suggestions?
>>
>>Best Regards!
>>
>>/xin
>>
>>>Zhangbu, how is Wu Chen's progress on the MuDST? What is his email
>>>address?
>>>
>>>-f.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Xu, Zhangbu wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, Frank:
>>>> Since we use FTPC as reference multiplicity in dAu, we need that
>>>>information in miniDST. Do we have that? Maybe the easiest way is
>>>>to put all the TOF information into MuDST.
>>>>Thanks!
>>>> Zhangbu
>>>
>>>
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jul 24 2003 - 00:39:41 EDT