From: Frank Geurts (geurts_at_rice.edu)
Date: Fri Mar 07 2003 - 11:49:51 EST
W.J. Llope wrote:
> At 9:26 AM -0600 3/7/03, Frank Geurts wrote:
>
>> we are back to the problems caused by very late L2 accepts ...
>> apparently Zoran M. is messing with that again.
>
>
> hmmmm. this started at ~4:20am (zoran sleeping?)
> and it was in the middle of a spill
> (we had behaved fine in previous runs in the same spill).
> maybe some reboot of some daq vme thing was needed too?
>
> (no note in the shift log on any of this yet - grrrrr)
from the log files it seemes this was happening for a while, apparantly
w/o TOF "going red"
here's a hint from yesterday's trigger discussion notes on startrig-hn:
> L2: Agree to test write changes, then connection to DAQ for BECM towers and then
> test aborts. ZM will finalize command and interface to daq with TL, then
> complete code for testing. ZM will work with JeffL to gresurrect and clarify
> connection to RTS GUI.
>
> 3rd time this run something like this happened (we get
> booted but the problem wasn't on our side)... sigh
Tonko has more than once told me that he knows it is not TOF and in fact
is glad we can provide more detailed proof of these L2 latencies.
>
>> I though of holding it back but I suppose we should come up w/ more
>> ammunition now: Bill, can you make a spreadsheet with localmon vs.
>> STAR events per day. I will be needing that to convince startrig ...
>
>
> a spreadsheet might be a bit much just to describe the effects
> to startrg. a few sentence summary would go just as far...
I would use the spreadsheet to create a plot of the ratio. I think such
a plot would be very powerful to convince startrig-hn of what is happening.
-f.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jul 24 2003 - 00:39:37 EDT