Re: Follow-up (Re: TOF problem in DAQ?)

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Tonko A. Ljubicic (tonko_at_bnl.gov)
Date: Fri Mar 14 2003 - 09:04:53 EST

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Frank Geurts wrote:

> Dear all,
> i am puzzled -again- ... checked all systems (pVPD-TOFp-TOFr HV,
> TOFp-TOFr NPS, TOFr gas all of it) but nothing shows up bad or suspect.
> In fact, everything looks very stable. The det.log file doesn't show any
> problems and the shiftcrew repeatedly affirms that TOF never went RED on
> the RTS display. The only 'suspect' was a rogue xterm process on tofpdaq
> that had grown to ~20Mb in size but didn't seem to take any CPU
> resources (all tail's and xterms have been killed now).

I was just checking and I see the TOF BUSY (the _actual_ BUSY at the TCD)
go to 100% after few hundred events without any messages in det.log
running pedAsPhys (with TPC).

Everything else looks peachy... System continues to respond to
start/stop etc. Don't know... Hardware?

Did TOF run OK after Wednesday's access at all?

        -- Tonko 

--
Tonko (Ante) Ljubicic                         Email: tonko_at_bnl.gov
Bldg. 510A                                    Tel: +1-631-344-7346
Brookhaven National Lab., P.O. Box 5000       Fax: +1-631-344-4206
Upton, NY, 11973
Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jul 24 2003 - 00:39:37 EDT