Re: Follow-up (Re: TOF problem in DAQ?)

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: W.J. Llope (llope_at_physics.rice.edu)
Date: Fri Mar 14 2003 - 10:45:26 EST

At 9:04 AM -0500 3/14/03, Tonko A. Ljubicic wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Frank Geurts wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>> i am puzzled -again- ... checked all systems (pVPD-TOFp-TOFr HV,
>> TOFp-TOFr NPS, TOFr gas all of it) but nothing shows up bad or suspect.
>> In fact, everything looks very stable. The det.log file doesn't show any
>> problems and the shiftcrew repeatedly affirms that TOF never went RED on
>> the RTS display. The only 'suspect' was a rogue xterm process on tofpdaq
>> that had grown to ~20Mb in size but didn't seem to take any CPU
>> resources (all tail's and xterms have been killed now).
>
>I was just checking and I see the TOF BUSY (the _actual_ BUSY at the TCD)
>go to 100% after few hundred events without any messages in det.log
>running pedAsPhys (with TPC).
>
>Everything else looks peachy... System continues to respond to
>start/stop etc. Don't know... Hardware?
>
>Did TOF run OK after Wednesday's access at all?

yep - 4072009 and around there are big UPC trig'd runs from yesterday
w/ tof happily running..
btw we made no changes on our side on wednesday....
cheers 

-- 

  W.J. Llope, Ph.D.                      Res. Assoc. Professor
  T.W. Bonner Nuclear Laboratory         phone:  713-348-4741
  Rice University, MS-315                fax:    713-348-5215
  6100 S. Main St.                  
  Houston, TX 77005-1892            
             e-mail:     llope_at_physics.rice.edu
             WWW home:   http://wjllope.rice.edu/default.html

--
                        
Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jul 24 2003 - 00:39:37 EDT