Due to inaccuracies of our knowledge of the geometrical positions of the equipment in the hall and of the magnitude and configuration of the magnetic field, the acceptance correction is imperfect. It is less reliable on the edges. Typically, when looking at either or spectra from a single setting with sufficiently fine binning one sees points on the edges of acceptance that deviate sharply from the overall pattern. These points must not be included in the fiducial cut area. A sharp non-constancy of , inconsistent between different settings, would indicate that a wrong was used.
Acceptance correction to the or spectra includes information about shape of the distribution. Therefore any uncertainty in the shape results in an uncertainty of the slope. In quantifying the uncertainty, the first step was to derive the error propagation factor to convert the uncertainty of the width into uncertainty of the inverse slope . I describe the with a Gaussian whose width I denote by . MC was run with two widths of input : and . The slopes were extracted in the two cases and compared, the error-propagation factor was found to be