next up previous contents
Next: matching: Si vs spectrometer Up: Determination of the trigger Previous: How to use the   Contents

Kopytine's homepage

Si - spectrometer acceptance matching

After the Si multiplicity is obtained, it needs to be compared with the spectrometer $ dN/d\eta $. One needs to take into account that Si acceptance is broader and extends further from midrapidity than spectrometer's; therefore $ dN/d\eta $ is measured over different ranges of $ \eta $. I had to involve RQMD simulation to be able to compare $ dN/d\eta $ from the Si and the spectrometer. In principle one can get the same answer from the measurement of non-identified $ dN/dy$ distribution for + and $ -$ (like NA49's $ h^{-}$ [41]).

Therefore I require that the absolute $ \,dN/\,d\eta$ in Si and spectrometer match with factors which I derive from RQMD distribution, see Table 4.3. The spectrometer acceptance was cut down to a fiducial range, free of the edge effects (monitored by the acceptance-corrected $ \,dN/\,d\eta$ histograms with high resolution in $ \eta $).

Table 4.3: RQMD-generated factors for acceptance matching. The following acceptance intervals were used. For the Si: $ {\eta }_{min}=1.5$, $ {\eta }_{max}=3.3$. For the spectrometer: in the low angle setting, $ {\eta }_{min}=3.6$, $ {\eta }_{max}=4.4$. In the high angle setting, $ {\eta }_{min}=2.6$, $ {\eta }_{max}=3.1$.

$ \frac{spectrometer}{Si (+ and -)/2}$ Spectrometer sign
  $ +$ $ -$
high angle 1.208 0.986
low angle 1.025 0.871


These factors are the ratios of $ dN/d\eta $ from the simulation alone. The simulation needs to know only the gross shape of $ dN/d\eta $ for both signs, which RQMD does know. (Its $ dN/dy$ distribution for pions has $ \sigma=1.4$ in agreement with NA49 $ h^{-}$ [41]. ) The words ``simulation alone'' mean that delta electrons which I do not simulate, as well as imperfections of Si alignment, which I do not know, do not affect the simulated factors. Massive particles have asymmetrical $ dN/d\eta $ distribution and our high angle spectrometer settings cover them more efficiently than Si. As a result, the simulated factors are different for $ +$ and $ -$ because of the asymmetry between protons/antiprotons and $ K^{+}/K^{-}$.


next up previous contents
Next: matching: Si vs spectrometer Up: Determination of the trigger Previous: How to use the   Contents
Mikhail Kopytine 2001-08-09