Next: matching: Si vs spectrometer
Up: Determination of the trigger
Previous: How to use the
  Contents
Kopytine's homepage
After the Si multiplicity is obtained, it needs to be compared with the
spectrometer
.
One needs to take into account that Si acceptance is broader
and extends further from midrapidity than spectrometer's;
therefore
is measured over different ranges of
.
I had to involve RQMD
simulation to be able to compare
from the Si and the spectrometer.
In principle one can get the same answer from the
measurement of non-identified
distribution for + and
(like NA49's
[41]).
Therefore I require that the absolute
in Si and spectrometer match with factors which I
derive from RQMD distribution, see Table 4.3.
The spectrometer acceptance was cut down to a fiducial range, free of the
edge effects (monitored by the acceptance-corrected
histograms with high resolution in
).
These factors
are the ratios of
from the simulation alone. The
simulation needs to know only the gross shape of
for
both signs, which RQMD does know. (Its
distribution for pions has
in agreement with
NA49
[41].
)
The words ``simulation alone'' mean that delta
electrons which I do not simulate, as well as imperfections of
Si alignment, which I do not know, do not affect the simulated
factors.
Massive particles have asymmetrical
distribution and our high angle spectrometer settings
cover them more efficiently than Si.
As a result, the simulated factors are different for
and
because of the
asymmetry between protons/antiprotons and
.
Next: matching: Si vs spectrometer
Up: Determination of the trigger
Previous: How to use the
  Contents
Mikhail Kopytine
2001-08-09